equality as in shared access

• You can’t make people create thing that have same/similar value, or ask them to only produce stuff with similar value. It is not realistic, man make stuff, stuff have different values, they worth what they worth, and man don’t know beforehand
• you can’t restrict man to only create/keep stuff with certain value
  • man have no control
  • robbing people with surplus is not right

[2023-07-06 Thu 14:22] research startup

• the notion of posession should be replaced with the notion of access.
  • posession may still be valid notion, not overthrown, but it will not be the place where equality works under. It is simply unrealistic to rob people or imprison people from creation and possesing their creation.
  • however it could be a social awareness that man share and should have access. The scope may vary to the degree which reality would allow(I don’t need access to a gym 500km away, and nor will it be able to provide them to all man in 500km distance)
  • an example is the free-and-open-source movement, where with GPL licencing equality is implemented that man share and have access to source code. The notion of possesion is not in the vision: it could retain, developers could still sell the code, yet the sharing and access operate independently.

[2023-07-06 Thu 14:25] research startup