SH:framing
Table of Contents
In secret hitler, framing could happen when:
- 1 - chancellor is given 2 fascist while president clain 1 facist 1 liberal
- 2 - chancellor is given 1 fascist 1 libearl but claim to be given 2 facist
As fascists are aware of each other, it is unlikely they’d fame one another, so we ignore the case where both of them are facists
- In scenario 1, president would be the facist, trying to pass a fascist policy, without claiming to have drawn 3 fascist policies(which would lower their government credit)
- In scenario 2, chancellor would be the facist trying to pass a fascist policy when given a choice.
In either way, one of the government would be a fascist and hence both would lose almost all credibility(there’s no way to tell which one is the fascist), hence it is almost a credibility-facist policy trade-off.
Backlinks
SH:credit government for fascist policy
Say, Player 1,2,3,4,5 are in the game, and a facist policy happened between (1,2), (1,4) and (3,5), and their stories complies, which means there’s no SH:framing, then it is a certainty that in those governments:
- president claim to have drawn 3 fascist policies
- chancellor claim to be passed 2 fascist policies
In this situation, a fuzzy credit could be applied by counting possible states(in hand, F means fascist policy, L means liberal policy):
| president id | chancellor id | president hand | chancellor hand |
| fascist | fascist | F F F | F F |
| fascist | fascist | F L F | F F |
| fascist | liberal | F L F | F F |
| fascist | fascist | F L L | F L |
| liberal | liberal | F F F | F F |
| liberal | fascist | F F F | F F |
- justification
- when president is liberal, and story complies, hand could only be F F F, as otherwise, if chancellor is liberal, L would be enacted; if fascist chancellor tried to enact F, SH:framing would occur.
- Interpretation As expectation, president is expected to be .6 fascist, and chancellor also .6. Therefore, credit of the government (president and chancellor) is lowered(by .6 to be exact) being liberal.
- In the example In the example, 1 would therefore have credit of -1.2, and 2,3,4,5, each -.6
SH:credit government for fascist policy
Say, Player 1,2,3,4,5 are in the game, and a facist policy happened between (1,2), (1,4) and (3,5), and their stories complies, which means there’s no SH:framing, then it is a certainty that in those governments:
- president claim to have drawn 3 fascist policies
- chancellor claim to be passed 2 fascist policies
In this situation, a fuzzy credit could be applied by counting possible states(in hand, F means fascist policy, L means liberal policy):
| president id | chancellor id | president hand | chancellor hand |
| fascist | fascist | F F F | F F |
| fascist | fascist | F L F | F F |
| fascist | liberal | F L F | F F |
| fascist | fascist | F L L | F L |
| liberal | liberal | F F F | F F |
| liberal | fascist | F F F | F F |
- justification
- when president is liberal, and story complies, hand could only be F F F, as otherwise, if chancellor is liberal, L would be enacted; if fascist chancellor tried to enact F, SH:framing would occur.
- Interpretation As expectation, president is expected to be .6 fascist, and chancellor also .6. Therefore, credit of the government (president and chancellor) is lowered(by .6 to be exact) being liberal.
- In the example In the example, 1 would therefore have credit of -1.2, and 2,3,4,5, each -.6